2022-06-30 18:13:11
Politico in the next tweet gives more context. But this initial tweet is misleading. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-1-1) Author
2022-06-30 18:37:42
Politico reports that Thomas LITERALLY SAID “They object on religious grounds.. because they were developed using CELL LINES derived from aborted children.” This in no way reflects the headline! I will link to the “untrustworthy” source. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-1-5) Author
2022-06-30 22:57:14
Clarence Thomas summarized the plaintiff's argument. He did not offer his opinion on it. This headline is grossly misleading. Read his dissent directly. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-1-1) Author
2022-06-30 23:17:40
Justice Thomas' quote is simply a summary of the argument. "They object on religious grounds to all available COVID–19 vaccines because they were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children." [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-1) Author
2022-07-01 03:25:34
The implication that Thomas said, "Covid vaccines in the U.S. contain...aborted fetuses," is misleading. He stated that vaccines were "developed using cell lines...from aborted children." [Link] Also, Thomas is not quoting petitioner's brief: no mention of "aborted children". [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(2-0-0) Author