2022-12-08 21:25:47
Schiff is citing statistics from Center for Countering Digital Hate. This study analyzes the number of tweets containing hate-related content. Elon Musk is citing internal Twitter statistics, which analyzes hate-related "impressions" rather than volume. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-4-6) Author
2022-12-08 22:05:36
Two different methods are used to define hate speech and how it's measured, neither are defined. Also the first link is 6 days old at this writing and has not been updated with current data. The end result is confusion not clarification. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-2-10) Author
2022-12-08 22:49:28
The author cites data to which only he has eyes, and therefore the claim is unverifiable. The author he's responding to, on the other hand, is operating from publicly available research. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-1-14) Author
2022-12-08 23:26:04
"But average ENGAGEMENT with tweets containing slurs has jumped since Musk took over..." "... The average ENGAGEMENT on tweets containing the slurs during the week in question was 33.5, over twice what it was before he took over." [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-1-9) Author
2022-12-09 01:56:31
While impressions may have lowered, "[p]roblematic content and formerly barred accounts have increased sharply in the short time since Elon Musk took over..." [Link] Without context, impressions may be "beside the point." [Link] "[T]he actual volume of hateful tweets has spiked." [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-7) Author
2022-12-09 02:07:53
The internal information available to Elon allows his statement to Stand. Others are speculating. [Link] via @politico NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-1-4) Author
2022-12-09 06:09:33
The user is providing no proof other than his word, as well as not providing all other data that could provide context. By cherry-picking what stats to tout, with no release of even surface level data, the user is potentially manipulating other users with misleading statements. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-1-9) Author