Community Notes Viewer

Tweet related community notes

2023-06-20 12:42:37
Opera GX does Run Chinese Spy Wear and mines for bitcoin and admits to it in Twitter DMs [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(1-1-19)
Author
2023-06-20 12:59:24
Right now there is zero evidence to support the claim that Opera GX is involved in mining Bitcoin for China.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-3-4)
Author
2023-06-20 14:01:11
There is no evidence that OperaGX is a Chinese Spyware. Opera shared information explaining the situation in details : [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(67-5-20)
Author
2023-06-20 15:21:39
Other note supporting Leafy's claim cites a user whose name is a racial slur with clearly edited images. It is unclear if Leafy is being facetious or sarcastic, but there is no evidence to suggest that Opera GX is a "chinese virus that mines bitcoin for china".
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-2)
Author
2023-06-20 15:41:17
NNN. Posted by account known for making satirical and exaggerated statements.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2)
Author
2023-06-20 16:10:08
They do not do this. He's just salty that he got ratio'd by their Twitter account. L
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-1-17)
Author
2023-06-20 16:18:38
Account is known for satirical takes. NNN
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-1-2)
Author
2023-06-20 22:39:11
While it may be true that there is no evidence to prove OperaGX is Chinese spyware, there is nothing to disprove this, either. The only source of information comes from Opera themselves, so people should take that with a grain of salt. Acc is also known for being satirical. NNN.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-1)
Author
2023-06-21 01:24:26
Opera started as a Norwegian technology company, but was then bought by a Chinese consortium in 2016 for $600 million. While there is no evidence that Opera is a virus for China to mine Bitcoin, Opera is owned by Chinese companies. [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-0)
Author
2023-06-22 08:06:43
While Opera is owned by the Chinese since 2016, there is no evidence that it's spyware. Many people in the past years tend to call it such while providing no evidence at all.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-2-0)
Author
Evaluate Notes