2023-06-29 18:56:18
The apology relates to criticism from gender activists who were angry that a women’s group, Sex Matters, booked a room at the museum for a meeting. Had People’s History Museum cancelled the booking or ‘de-platformed’ Sex Matters they would have been been breaking the law. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-1-5) Author
2023-06-29 20:07:38
NNN - Apologising for something is in no way a fact claim about the law generally or the equality act specifically. Claims about whether one of a wide array of alternative actions would be unlawful are neither exhaustive or relevant. Disagreement belongs in replies/Quote tweets NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-5) Author
2023-06-29 21:54:40
The tweet appears to offer an apology for NOT unlawfully discriminating against @SexMattersOrg on the grounds of a protected belief. The tweet implies an intention to unlawfully discriminate in future. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-1-5) Author
2023-06-29 22:54:12
It is not unlawful for an organisation to refuse to host anti-transgender groups such as @SexMatters. No such law against this exists in the United Kingdom. NNN. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-5) Author