2023-09-07 02:39:07
For Additional context Mr. Sinclair failed an independent polygraph test to verify his claims. The result “indicated deception” Mr. Sinclair has a 27-year criminal record, involving deceit. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-7-34) Author
2023-09-07 03:38:23
NNN Every liberal claims that this guys past is somehow relevant when those same liberals scream "racist" when the pasts of BLMs heros are brought up. Odd. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(8-1-30) Author
2023-09-07 04:15:55
Links to smear jobs in the tabloid press Politico owned by German news mogul Axel Springer known for vindictive yellow journalism with ties to the CIA etc. are unreliable. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(4-0-20) Author
2023-09-07 04:39:53
NNN. Tucker is posting a report of what Larry Sinclair made as a claim. There is nothing at all needed to add to the content that speaks for itself. Failing a polygraph is not proof of lying, and are not infallible. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(23-1-15) Author
2023-09-07 06:22:42
YNN (Yes Note Needed) Just like BLM 'victims', everybody's past needs to be considered when they make claims. Especially Sinclair who has a big history of being a con and being deceitful. CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(1-2-18) Author
2023-09-07 07:27:00
Sinclair’s decade old claims lack evidence and have not been substantiated. 1) Sinclair failed an independent polygraph test to verify his claims. The result “indicated deception”. 2) Sinclair has a 27-year criminal record, specifically with crimes involving deceit or fraud. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(32-0-21) Author
2023-09-07 10:12:51
This 25-year old claim by Mr Sinclair has never been substantiated with evidence. Important context to consider is that Mr Sinclair failed a polygraph to verify this claim. Mr Sinclair also has a long criminal record involving several charges of forgery and felony theft. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(34-3-28) Author
2023-09-07 11:51:08
It is an interview to be interpreted by the listener. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-1-15) Author
2023-09-12 17:33:24
NNN!!!! Which part of "Assess fot yourself" is unclear?!? Stop using CN as a means to make privileged (by position) comments! NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-1-4) Author