2023-10-06 22:30:59
NNN, The company has confirmed the attack: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-1-4) Author
2023-10-07 05:26:31
More context: the company’s servers were not breached. The attackers logged in to user accounts that had simple or reused passwords, and leveraged the “DNA relatives” feature to gain more information. “The information does not appear to include actual, raw genetic data.” [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(23-4-17) Author
2023-10-07 06:56:23
NNN, the original post explicitly identifies this as credential stuffing and doesn't claim that genetic data was released. Notes aren't intended to rebut claims that haven't been made. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-1-1) Author
2023-10-07 09:54:48
Believe it or not, password guessing and using leaked passwords on other services in, in fact, a hack. NNN. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-1) Author
2023-10-07 12:44:01
Note Needed. Current voted note adds important context that is lacking from the original post. Not every Community Note is a rebuttal or dispute of the original post. Some posts can benefit from added context, such as this one. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-3) Author
2023-10-07 20:21:19
"Added context" is not necessary when there are no MISLEADING omissions. The note only describes in more words what the tweet describes very succinctly as a 'credential stuffing attack.' Use notes for misinformation, not for pasting your own comment onto someone else's tweet. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-0) Author