Community Notes Viewer

2023-10-12 21:36:13
Jackson Hinkle has cropped the photo to manipulate the algorithm into thinking it’s AI generated the photo posted by Ben is not the one in the screenshot from AI or Not.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(10-7-25)
Author

2023-10-12 22:27:40
This photo is not an "AI-generated fake image", it was released by the Prime Minister of Israel: [Link] It was confirmed by local journalists at the Jerusalem Post: [Link] The New York Times reports that AI image detectors are not always accurate: [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(91-3-58)
Author

2023-10-12 23:17:55
The website to detect AI generation gives different results depending on if the image is downloaded or screen-shotted. The cited source clarified this in the replies. Also, just because Netanyahu posted it is not proof the image is real. Netanyahu is not infallible.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-4-16)
Author

2023-10-13 00:24:26
When other users uploaded the image, ‘AI or Not’ states it cannot tell if it is AI. The website is not 100% accurate. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(13-1-8)
Author

2023-10-13 00:41:38
This is a real photo: [Link] The Optic AI Or Not web-based app is not 100% accurate. It could not tell that an image of former president Donald Trump kissing Anthony Fauci, which was created specifically to mislead audiences, was generated by AI: [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(80-2-39)
Author

2023-10-13 01:32:18
Originated on telegram: [Link] Claims of Al-generated image are questionable. Optic only accurate for images created with Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, Dall-E, or GAN. The same tool thought an Al generated image of Trump kissing Anthony Fauci was human. Other TG image returns human.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(17-0-13)
Author

2023-10-13 02:57:08
AI detectors can be inaccurate: [Link] Multiple users on X have used this website (aiornot.com) to verify images, with inaccurate results. Confirmed real picture of a pen is seen as AI: [Link] Confirmed fake Biden image seen as real: [Link] Different results based on the same image [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(170-5-33)
Author

2023-10-13 04:50:44
The recent community note on Ben's post was removed because these pictures are real and not AI-generated like previously claimed by Jackson and others. [Link] [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(43-0-10)
Author

2023-10-13 09:40:26
This photo is AI generated, as shown by the accurate OPTIC tester, with up to 97% accuracy on all GAN methods and different models, with each being only certain elements. Here is the original photo, which was cropped and AI was used to insert the middle content. [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-18)
Author

2023-10-13 10:31:23
Even though AI image detectors can be unreliable or inaccurate, the current image published by Ben Sephiroh is, in fact, false. In an analysis made by Arlington Post using a technique called Error Level Analysis, is shown how it's possible to know that the image is false: [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-0-24)
Author

2023-10-13 17:43:30
Thorough analysis has sadly confirmed the authenticity of the photo. The claim that it is AI generated, is disinformation. It is in fact the reverse: the photo with the dog is the fake. Read about the analysis here: [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(23-0-5)
Author

2023-10-13 18:55:34
All CN’s are about whether or not the image posted by Netanyahu and Shapiro are fake, altered or AI generated. But people seem to go past the photo which show ‘something’ burned. From the remains it is impossible to tell if this is in fact a human infant.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2)
Author

2023-10-13 20:05:11
AI Detection websites are known to be VERY UNRELIABLE. There is currently no way to 100% detect AI generated text or images. No AI detection tool should be treated as proof something isn't real. Countless times it has said real images are fake.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(82-10-29)
Author