2023-10-21 12:49:31
It's the current princess, the video is just slowed down. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-2) Author
2023-10-21 13:57:25
NNN. There was no false claim made. The op stated a fact. This is princess Beatrice. The account is alluding to her looking “creepy.” Which is a personal opinion. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-0) Author
2023-10-21 15:35:45
NNN This is Princess Beatrice, even if filtered. Abuse of Notes NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-2) Author
2023-10-24 10:23:17
A note which agrees with the post is never required. Wikipedia links are not a trustworthy source for anything except 'what is written on Wikipedia'. Raw search engine links are not trustworthy sources under any circumstances. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-1) Author
2023-10-25 08:09:55
YNN; while Wikipedia is a poor source, community notes are for context, not merely for contradicting posts' claims. A technically-true post which is misleading can have a note. A difficult-to-believe true post may need a note—with proper sources, of course. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0) Author