2023-12-07 01:20:54
At a Congressional hearing yesterday, Liz Magill refused to say if calling for Jewish genocide is against the university code of conduct. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(82-2-6) Author
2023-12-07 01:27:10
While under oath in congress Liz Magill answered differently by avoiding a direct answer. Which can be seen here: [Link] & here: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(78-4-6) Author
2023-12-07 01:32:44
NNN The individual in the video is clearly mentioning “I should have focused” to note their speech should have focused on the genocide, and subsequently would have different answer. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(9-3-58) Author
2023-12-07 01:35:37
President Magill’s statement is a lie. University of Pennsylvania practices viewpoint discrimination as a matter of policy. While faculty, staff and students are free to call for a genocide of Jewish people ([Link] a professor is being fired for expressing her views ([Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(73-15-17) Author
2023-12-07 07:42:21
"Speech alone is not punishable"? The First amendment has been absolutely clarified to mention that Speech that incites imminent lawless action, or constitutes a true threat, is not protected by the First Amendment. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(44-5-6) Author
2023-12-07 09:14:00
Incentive for total free academic discourse can never (nor should) be confused with encouraging free political speech. Sally K.(MIT) Liz M.(Penn) and Claudine(Harvard) purposefully attempt to confuse freedom of academic discourse with free speech. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(24-2-11) Author
2023-12-07 11:01:55
President Liz Magill's tone is now serious and concerned, while she was viciously smiling, when referring to "a context" to escape the main issue, and justify antisemitism at Penn.edu during the congressional hearing. Then she is obviously lying, when faced to the consequences. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(21-5-14) Author
2023-12-07 13:48:14
President Magill has posted this in response to public backlash, and adjusted their stance as given to Congress. It appears external pressure has forced this self preservation mea culpa. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(26-5-8) Author
2023-12-07 14:24:59
Note this statement is not under oath as the previous day's statement to congress was; and notice at the bottom, they chose to lock out the ability to comment; you can't leave a comment on this post. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(32-2-10) Author
2023-12-07 17:01:27
Calls for violence are not considered free speech and are therefore not protected under the US Constitution as Magill implies in the video. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(47-1-7) Author
2023-12-07 17:37:26
The note claiming that "calls for violence" are not protected speech is flat wrong. As law professor Alan Dershowitz said just yesterday: "You can advocate, under the First Amendment, . . . 'we think that the Jews . . . should be exterminated.' That's protected speech." [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-1-11) Author