2024-01-08 23:37:20
People are retweeting this not knowing it is a "thought experiment", because the majority of people will not read the tweet below that explains this. This is deliberately misleading, and a community note is necessary as it is more likely to be seen than the follow up tweet. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(16-0-7) Author
2024-01-09 02:31:32
NNN. It's clearly a thought experiment. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-11) Author
2024-01-09 04:14:23
None of this happened This is a bad faith argument that is often used to oppose any protest [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(9-1-5) Author
2024-01-09 06:30:09
This did not happen, the author admits this in the replies. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(14-1-1) Author
2024-01-09 09:11:02
This is a thought experiment misrepresented as a real event. The author of the tweet admits it himself in the thread. Source: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-0-1) Author
2024-01-09 12:33:54
Multiple posters have confused this thought experiment with a factual account of real events. The author has confirmed that they were posing a hypothetical. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(13-1-1) Author
2024-01-09 20:42:00
In addition to this being a poorly labeled thought experiment (the reply having 6.5% of the views of the first post), there are many hospitals on both sides of the bridge in question and virtually no reason to transport a patient in critical condition to a different borough. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-2-0) Author