2024-01-17 15:41:21
This is false. The bill does not allow a state to take custody of kids. To the contrary, it prohibits a state from taking custody of a kid because of gender care issues. This is crystal clear from just reading the next sentence in the excerpt given. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-17) Author
2024-01-17 16:33:00
NNN. The next sentence in the excerpt prohibits a court from taking custody based on a child receiving “gender-affirming health care” - but the highlighted sentence specifically allows a court to take custody based on a child NOT receiving “gender-affirming health care”. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(9-0-0) Author
2024-01-17 19:00:17
NNN The only note visible at the time of writing this says that the next sentence contradicts the claim, but it doesn’t. The 1st sentence is taking legal jurisdiction, 2nd is about physical removal. The post is factual. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-0-2) Author
2024-01-17 21:37:02
NNN: the bill is stating that a subpoena filed from a parent or guardian out of state who is against the medical or psychological transition "gender affirming care" will not be enacted on by the courts in Maine. This bill is full of double-speak and falsehoods. www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/getPDF.asp?paper=HP1114&item=1&snum=131 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-1-0) Author
2024-01-18 14:34:13
This bill is about not enforcing another states ban against gender affirming care, indicating that the state could take custody to assure gender affirming care is provided to a child. The whole decision on this should be read, because that small paragraph is confusing to others. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-0) Author