2024-01-21 19:43:22
While influence is evident, Palworld's designs would fall under the parody exception in Copyright Law. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-1-8) Author
2024-01-21 20:14:25
NNN. The issue isn't it parodying or being influenced Pokemon, it's the suggestion that the AI was fed the original Pokemon characters and used that copyrighted material to create 'new' characters. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2) Author
2024-01-21 21:15:37
This is an article about a public reaction to something and not a legal accusation. People are allowed to consider a derivative product a knock-off regardless of if it's distinct in the eyes of the law. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2) Author
2024-01-21 21:26:11
NNN Whether this falls under this or that law is a legal question that only a court can clarify, certainly not Twitter users with the "privilege" of writing community notes. Use the comments for such speculation. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-2) Author
2024-01-21 22:18:27
There is no actual proof that Palworld contains AI generated art, text or music. The fact that the CEO is enthusiastic about GPT-4 and generative AI does not prove it was used in Palworld. There are plenty of human concept and character designers credited for the game: pocketpair.jp/palworld/palworld-credit NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-6) Author
2024-01-21 22:54:03
NNN Post is correct in saying that Palworld has been accused of plagiarism, it's not misleading. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-0-2) Author