2024-03-07 06:36:15
Her statement says in quotes "rigged" which is past tense but her tweet in question says "rig". Which means her statement is factually incorrect [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(5-0-17) Author
2024-03-07 06:40:09
"Rigging" implies illegal manipulation of electoral outcomes, a serious violation undermining democracy. Outspending on advertising, supported by Citizens United v. FEC, falls under protected free speech, provided it adheres to campaign finance laws. It's not "rigging." [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(64-3-25) Author
2024-03-07 14:29:29
She provides the definition of the word. If you think it “implies” something else, you’ll need to support that with a link to a relevant source, not an FTC link or something about the tense. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-1-16) Author
2024-03-07 15:33:13
Please go away [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(4-1-27) Author
2024-03-07 15:35:41
NNN - She's hedged enough in the statement that it is clear that it is a personal opinion. Personal arguments on whether or not Citizens United applies in this instance should be taken to the comments. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(8-2-10) Author
2024-03-07 23:44:51
Words do not have unitary and exclusive definitions. “Rigged” may have certain customary expectations, but the poster is explicit what definition they are operating under. NNN NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-5) Author