2024-03-12 20:40:03
Roosevelt and Churchill were elected to office through democratic means and conducted a democratic administration. Also, there are no records of famine caused by these individuals in any territory wholly or partially depending from their respective administrations. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-0) Author
2024-03-12 21:12:31
It is widely accepted that British wartime policy in India (Churchill’s government) exacerbated if not caused the 1943 famine in Bengal, by stockpiling grain for military use and exporting Bengali grain to the Middle East. Proposed note isn’t correct: [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(1-0-2) Author
2024-03-13 03:42:32
While Winston Churchill's policies were indeed to blame for the famine in Bengal, Franklin Roosevelt was democratically elected, and thus doesn't fit the definition of "imperialist dictator". However, Stalin fits both "famine maker" and "imperialist dictator": [Link][Link][Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(14-0-3) Author
2024-03-15 23:47:54
The post is a joke. The post doesn't even imply Stalin doesn't fit into those categories (though he doesn't) Churchill fits as famine maker ([Link] Roosevelt fits as an imperialist dictator, imperialism needs no explanation (it's the USA) and he was certalinly ""authoritarian"" ([Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0) Author