2024-03-13 03:50:25
This thread does not provide any concrete evidence that associates "Stonetoss" with this man. At best, there are some coincidental overlaps in time, and a similar art style. Please take what you read on the internet with a grain of salt. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(42-9-266) Author
2024-03-13 04:47:07
This community note is the must blatant cope I have ever seen. Internet equivalent of a toddler exclaiming "nuh uh" on whether of not they got into the powdered sugar despite being covered in it. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(32-3-33) Author
2024-03-13 04:49:39
NNN. The purpose of a community note is to correct tweets with known misleading or false information in them. The current suggested note is purely speculation and can't prove the information is incorrect, let alone provide a verifiable correction. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(57-0-12) Author
2024-03-13 05:58:45
Their justification is laid out in the thread, casting doubt on it is speculation, which isn’t what CNs are for. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(36-0-12) Author
2024-03-13 06:37:25
NNN. A link to the wikipedia page for misinformation? Seriously? What a misuse of the CNs. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(50-0-14) Author
2024-03-13 09:16:27
NNN. It’s up to the reader to come to their own conclusions and form their own judgement by reading the evidence laid out in the post. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(31-1-9) Author
2024-03-13 11:16:35
All political cartoonists engage in transgression. This defamatory thread cherry-picks Stonetoss' wide ranging coverage to justify doxxing & censorship, ignoring their stated beliefs aligned with classical liberalism ("pro-speech, anti-war, anti-authoritarian & pro-equality"): [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(23-0-182) Author
2024-03-13 11:27:04
NNN God ya'll are embarrassing. This thread doesn't need to be noted. Also the wikipedia page for misinformation isn't a source NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(51-2-14) Author
2024-03-13 21:05:43
NNN. Please remember to report people abusing the community notes function. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-1) Author