2024-03-12 23:29:44
Climbing onto a roof without authorisation is considered trespassing. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-1-36) Author
2024-03-12 23:40:19
NNN. There is a clear autoritharian judicial court behavior in Brazil. Protests similar to this have happened many times in the last with no consequence in recente past, such as 2013 and 2017. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(25-1-7) Author
2024-03-12 23:49:25
This false. His crime was not standing on a building and filming. He was convicted of “abolition of the democratic state, coup d'état, qualified damage, criminal association and deterioration of listed property” (Google translate). [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(11-0-59) Author
2024-03-13 01:05:26
NNN - calling the crime differently doesnt Change the Actions for which some get arrested. The phrase "His crime:" here is Not used to telling the exactly law Text, but what He did to get arrested. Which was, climbing on the building and filming. So its correct NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-1-3) Author
2024-03-13 02:06:08
The post was factual but the CN is misleading. The CN section is used to harass targeted contributors like End Wokeness and detracts from the X platform NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-4) Author
2024-03-13 09:14:31
scam with camera and country flag? [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-6) Author
2024-03-13 17:40:49
Firmino et al. were charged with armed criminal association, violent abolition of the rule of law, coup d'etat and causing damage using a flammable substance (Penal Code of Brazil, 288, 359-L, 359-M, 163). [Link][Link] (Interim ruling belonging to the same case, in Portuguese): [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-8) Author