2024-03-20 17:01:53
Richard Dawkins is wrong when he says all X0 people are female and all XXY are male. Biology is more diverse than some can apparently acknowledge Here is an example of an XO male person: [Link] Here is an example of an XXY female person: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-5) Author
2024-03-20 22:08:50
NNN. The very rare single examples given in the note above in no way invalidate the point Dawkins is making regarding Fausto-Sterling's percentages. Stop using CN to try to make yourself look clever. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-1-0) Author
2024-03-21 07:20:49
It is only called Klinefelter syndrome when XXY occurs in males. XXY females are so called SRY negative females. It is only called Turner syndrome when X0 occurs in females. There is only one example of a X0 male to date and his condition was not called Turner syndrome. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-0) Author