2024-04-19 21:44:59
Cass was a systematic review. Part of the review critiqued all of the guidelines mentioned in the post and found serious deficiencies in all of them, including poor quality evidence and many circular references. That is why the Cass report contradicts them. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(27-0-8) Author
2024-04-19 22:20:10
NNN, the Cass Review is a deeply biased report, which was created with a clear anti-trans agenda. It dismisses swathes of sources with impossible standards, & ignores reputable studies in favour of speculation. The changes proposed would lead to suffering & potential death. CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(2-0-12) Author
2024-04-20 00:48:32
The Cass Review was commissioned by NHS England to make recommendation on gender identity services for children and adolescents. The World Health Organization make no recommendations for children or adolescents on this matter. Page 3, item 5. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-0-4) Author
2024-04-20 01:52:01
The Cass Review (sections 9.20–9.23) cites research showing that "few guidelines systematically reviewed empirical evidence". Instead, through the use of circular citations (each guideline citing the other), these guidelines create a misleading appearance of consensus. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-0-5) Author
2024-04-20 11:19:57
The WHO recently stated "the evidence base for children and adolescents is limited and variable regarding the longer-term outcomes of gender affirming care for children and adolescents" which is similar to the conclusions of the Cass Review. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-0-2) Author