2024-04-25 01:03:42
Austen leaves out that this would only apply to those with annual incomes above $100,000,000, or .002% of the population, while the vast majority of investments are driven by retirement funds of Americans who make far less than that. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(34-3-127) Author
2024-04-25 01:28:54
NNN - the income level of the taxpayer it would apply to is irrelevant. The original post is factually correct. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(79-0-11) Author
2024-04-25 16:27:07
Note Is Needed - the income level is important since Austen is arguing that it would single-handedly crush the economy, which is based on a misrepresentation of what this proposal would affect. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-30) Author