2024-05-10 18:24:52
A state review of the county’s audit of the 2020 presidential race found errors and inconsistencies in the vote count, including some double counting of ballots. But the errors weren’t enough to alter the election results, according to the review and outside experts. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-3-69) Author
2024-05-10 18:35:10
NNN This post is simply reporting on the findings of this investigation. Further context about the impact on the election is irrelevant to the posts veracity and should be left to discussion in the comments. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(27-0-5) Author
2024-05-10 18:59:41
NNN the post makes no claim as to the validity of the election results, just reaffirms that ballots were counted twice and ballots are unaccounted for. Your note should be a comment not a note. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-0-5) Author
2024-05-10 19:01:24
NNN The proposed note is not needed because it is not a fact-check of what the OP posted. It does not contradict anything in the original post. It should be posted as a comment, not a Community Note. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-0-5) Author
2024-05-10 19:06:48
NNN put your OPINION in the comments. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(17-0-8) Author
2024-05-10 20:10:32
NNN and other notes not needed. You should just rate the note not helpful rather than taking up time and space with the back and forth. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-4) Author
2024-05-10 20:12:24
1) ~60K voted on election day. Not 380,761. [Link] + vote type 2) duplicate tallies Trump: 1,401 Trump Biden: 1,713 Biden Jorgensen: 52 blank: 16 SEB meeting @ 05:06:20 [Link] 3) The hand-tally of 5M paper ballots and rescanning of 5M paper ballots gave the same outcome for President. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(25-2-43) Author
2024-05-10 20:34:14
NNN, the current notes are incorrect. @mad_liberals is doing the investigation on this in the comments, which backs up the statement provided in the original post (plus more). This includes video of the data, plus file dumps of the relevant ballots. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(18-1-6) Author
2024-05-11 15:49:33
The order identified 36 inconsistencies in batch tally sheets for the audit, but found they were due to “human error” and not “intentional misconduct.” It also found they did not affect the final election results as they represented a “fractional number” of the votes cast. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(8-0-7) Author