2024-06-18 14:36:00
The company Reform UK hired, vetting.com, does not conduct its own vetting, but rather it allows others to use its platform to perform their own vetting. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(60-2-11) Author
2024-06-18 16:17:59
They claim they paid £144k for the company to carry out the vetting. No evidence gave against that. It's an assumption to say this didn't occur and that the only service they could have possibly have had was to vet people themselves on the platform. Other tweets are not a source. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-1-11) Author
2024-06-18 16:54:55
The CEO of Vetting.com, Colin Bloom, has released a statement saying that they intended to carry out the background checks, but were expecting a general election in the Autumn, and were unable to meet the shorter deadline. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(8-0-2) Author
2024-06-18 16:55:11
You cannot definitively say they only had a license to use the vetting platform - you are not privy to the contract they agreed and without any evidence of this contract, you cannot make a CN of this nature. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-4) Author
2024-06-18 17:18:30
NNN: A statement from Vetting.com has now alleged a lack of time was to blame, not that they were not hired to do the work. "But Vetting said it simply did not have time to scrutinise all 609 of Reform’s candidates before the snap summer poll." [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-4) Author