2024-06-21 10:01:05
This is not a poll from a recognised source and it can be considered misleading to claim the data is drawn from one. It is instead based on personal doorstep conversations/canvassing. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-1-11) Author
2024-06-21 10:02:05
This is not an poll made by a reputable agency and asking "people on the doorstep" is not representative. This graph is misleading. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-10) Author
2024-06-21 10:44:17
NNN, nowhere does the poll claim to be from a recognised pollster. Keep to the comments instead of using a CN. The author has never claimed this is from a recognised pollster For the proposed CN, stating that asking people on the doorstep is not representative, is an opinion [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-1-2) Author
2024-06-21 10:48:19
The polling data source is indicated in the graphic itself in substantially large font and it is this very information which editors are citing as a reason the post may be misleading. This is a vexatious, redundant, and self-contradictory assertion. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-2) Author
2024-06-21 11:47:07
These are one candidates canvassing results, they are not a random or representative sample and the method of collection can easily introduce large biases. For a candidate to present them as polling results seems designed to attempt to mislead their voters: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-7) Author
2024-06-21 15:41:58
NNN—It is inappropriate for CNs to point out information which is unambiguously stated in the OP. CNs exist to challenge misinformation, not hold people’s hands and point them towards information which is already there in black and white. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0) Author