2024-07-01 08:19:31
The thread is absolutely false. Bone structure, density, shape and other factors are different for males and females. Scientists can determine by your skeleton if you were a man or a woman as show here [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(95-6-118) Author
2024-07-01 08:55:52
NNN - Post is wholesome and just wants to assure people that they are loved. This becomes clear once the thread is read. No one is trying to actually make the bone structure argument. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-0-26) Author
2024-07-01 08:58:13
NNN. Bone structure varies too much to be able to exactly tell whether someone's skeleton is male or female. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(13-0-23) Author
2024-07-01 08:59:29
NNN — this post isn't about only the shape of the bones. It's about the fact archeology also includes context from the gravesite and other graves nearby to inform their conclusions about the buried person. Note totally misses the point. Also it's opinion. So NNN regardless. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(16-1-19) Author
2024-07-01 09:03:11
NNN, from your own source: "Sex is typically determined by the morphology (shape) of the pelvis or skull and long bone[s]", but "many of the areas [...] that are used for sex estimation may be missing or damaged". Now read the post and see what it's actually meant to say. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-1-19) Author
2024-07-01 09:03:36
NNN - Trans means transGENDER, gender is a social construct and has nothing to do with your bones. The note is pure transphobia hidden as biology/archeology. We, archeologists and historians hate transphobes ^^ [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(19-1-33) Author
2024-07-01 09:05:29
NNN, Nothing in the thread is factually wrong. Aside from being an opinion by the thread creator. Current archaeologists do have to take into account a wide range of things to determine gender rather than just looking at the bones. It is not uncommon for them to be wrong. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(26-0-23) Author
2024-07-01 09:08:20
NNN. the post is talking about gender, not sex. Although bone structure might be leading to determine the sex of an individual it is not a fail proof method. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(24-1-28) Author
2024-07-01 12:20:08
NNN The post of factually correct. An archeologist would take into account the possible clothing and procedures to determine the gender identity. Gender identity and biological sex are not the same thing. Gender is not genetic. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-1-26) Author
2024-07-01 16:02:48
NNN. This is in fact correct. When an archaeologist finds a skeleton, they may use bone density and shape to initially gender a skeleton, but usually use contextual evidence to form a more realistic hypothesis. An example of this happening is here: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(27-2-22) Author