2024-07-01 20:27:16
Presidents do not have the ability to declare any order an “official act”. The basis behind what constitutes an official action are broad, but do not extend to unilaterally altering the constitution or inventing laws. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-0-24) Author
2024-07-01 20:46:52
NNN - The post is a) a personal opinion and b) referencing the recent SCOTUS verdict which, to the point the post was made, maintained the ambiguity about what consisted a official act. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-2-3) Author
2024-07-01 21:25:39
NNN - this is clearly a question. They want to know what is stopping him from doing this. Just answer in the comments. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-1-1) Author
2024-07-02 01:06:57
There is a difference between (1) whether or not a president can do something (e.g., cancel student debt) and (2) whether a president can be prosecuted as a criminal for taking that act. The recent SCOTUS opinion on presidential immunity dealt only with the latter question. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-1-17) Author
2024-07-02 05:38:03
NNN - The recent Supreme Court ruling provided some guidance on what constitutes an official act for a president, but left many aspects open to interpretation. Source- [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2) Author
2024-07-02 11:49:20
This post is a “What If” question. No facts are presented, so no Community Notes are needed. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-1) Author