2024-07-29 11:27:30
The Cass Review has not been “widely discredited”. There is proof that there is lack of evidence to support Gender Affirming Care. This has sent many people and organisations who have a vested interest in GAC into a tailspin of deceit and denial. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-7) Author
2024-07-29 11:40:31
This tweet is factually correct and this is not disputed. The thread below states that the Cass Review has been widely refuted by various and international organisations, this is also factually correct. [Link] The other comments in the note above are opinion. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-4) Author
2024-07-29 16:12:29
Post is statement of fact. Furthermore, the Cass Report has been widely critiqued for its anti-trans bias on a variety of fronts. [Link][Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-2) Author
2024-07-29 17:58:46
NNN The validity of many of sources in quirky winter lark's link are questionable. OP is factually correct. The Cass review fails to meet scientific standards and is not peer reviewed and is therefore not a good standard for care. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-3) Author
2024-07-30 06:14:12
TransactualCIC is primarily run by adult, transsexual men who themselves had a healthy puberty. Transitioned men have no obvious connection with the new cohort of pre-pubertal children which the Cass Review was specifically tasked to look at. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-2) Author