2024-07-31 00:53:36
The article clearly states that the funds aren’t going to be used to buy filters, but instead to develop a "policy framework" for indoor air quality regulations and legislation. " [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-1) Author
2024-07-31 01:15:18
This post is riddled with misinformation - Minister in article is quoted in his capacity as Minister for Medical Research, not Education & post’s claim that $10 million will be spent on “filters” is completely false All details clearly laid out in article: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-1) Author
2024-07-31 03:37:06
Health departments worldwide support the claims that improvements in indoor air quality are crucial in reducing the impact of COVID-19. [Link][Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-2) Author
2024-07-31 08:27:40
NNN The OP is expressing the view that poverty is a greater threat to public health than respiratory viruses and so there may be better ways to spend the $10m. Anyone who disagrees should use the comments. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-0) Author