2024-08-10 10:59:51
NN, per Rule 4. Adil Rashid did not ‘walk free.’ He was found guilty of rape in a British Court. This is because ignorance of the law is not a defence in British Courts. [Link] The original post otherwise expresses an opinion about jail sentences. For this, no note is required. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(86-14-193) Author
2024-08-10 11:22:17
NNN, although found guilty, he did walk free with only a suspended sentence, so post is factually correct. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(184-3-11) Author
2024-08-10 12:34:32
NNN - 'Walk free' is a factually correct claim. The aforementioned rapist did not receive a prison sentence. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(132-1-17) Author
2024-08-10 13:29:40
NNN - A "suspended sentence" means the person will not serve any jail time, hence why the OP stated this person was allowed to walk free. His "ignorance" did not exonerate him of the crime, but it's the reason he was given a lighter sentence. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(104-5-15) Author
2024-08-10 15:24:52
This article dates from 2013 and is old news, we can’t keep going back over the last tens years news as if it just happened or is representative of the current situation. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(39-4-147) Author
2024-08-10 16:33:37
Happened some years back , but raping a 13 years old and then walking free is mind blogging and shows the weak law and justice system. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(37-5-21) Author
2024-08-10 17:17:18
10 years ago. Both were teens. Her age matched the age of consent in Japan and was 1 year below the age of consent in Austria, Brazil and Germany (and Hawaii in 1999). Obviously a crime (statutory rape) but not violent rape as inferred by the post [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(50-5-117) Author
2024-08-10 17:42:34
Since 50+yo Muhammad married Aisha when she was 6yo and consummated that marriage at 9yo, why would anyone be surprised that adherents to that religion wouldn't at least be confused about ch!ld r@pe? He was no prophet at all, just a warlord who adopted symbol of a pagan moon god CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(3-1-10) Author
2024-08-10 18:35:34
CONTEXT: This incident happened over 11 years ago. The judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’. 18 year old Rashid told police he was seduced. Learn more on the original article: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(72-5-128) Author
2024-08-11 00:35:49
NNN, the date is clearly shown as 2013 on the article and the OP doesn’t portray it as breaking or recent. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(26-0-10) Author
2024-08-11 01:03:19
NNN. The post is factually correct and not misleading. Rashid was spared jail (essentially equivalent to walking free) because he supposedly didn't know that what he did was illegal. The suggested notes only focus on irrelevant details that don't disprove this central premise. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(49-1-14) Author