2024-08-30 22:08:48
Mr. Musk never intended to fight for free speech, but rather to interfere in the democracy and creating disruption. • When he agreed to promote censorship: [Link] • When his tweets resulted in losses for companies: [Link] • When he refused to name a legal representative in Brazil: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(16-0-112) Author
2024-08-30 22:20:07
NNN - post expresses personal opinion. Debate Musk’s characterization of the situation in the replies. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(49-0-3) Author
2024-08-31 01:51:02
The Brazilian Constitution does not provide for the election of judges. In our democracy, Supreme Court judges are appointed by elected presidents and approved by elected senators. After the procedure, they have the legitimacy to make decisions. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(8-0-40) Author
2024-08-31 07:01:52
Invalid argument. The notion of free speech in the 1st US Amendment does not exist in Brazilian law. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-30) Author
2024-08-31 11:49:28
No note needed. Stop abusing community notes. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-0-1) Author