2024-09-12 13:22:41
Source states: ...targets false content that hurts election integrity or public health, calls for denouncing a group or injuring a person, or risks disrupting key infrastructure or emergency services. Misinformation is strictly defined. www.reuters.com/technology/australia-threatens-fines-social-media-giants-enabling-misinformation-2024-09-12/ NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(38-4-170) Author
2024-09-12 13:28:32
NNN. Nothing listed in the proposed note or the source is "strictly defined." Election interference alone is subject to misuse as we have recent historical evidence of true information being deemed such. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(66-3-10) Author
2024-09-12 13:31:41
Nothing in the proposed community note contradicts the post. It is correct that fines are proposed for what an entity deems misinformation. The original post makes no other claims other than a quote that expresses a personal opinion. Such notes should be relegated to comments NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(71-1-8) Author
2024-09-12 13:52:02
NNN Leave in the comments. "hurts.. public health...or risks disrupting.." "or" does heavy lifting once you include even one broad category Covid shut all down for public health, censor Bhattacharya for PH. Broad categories give power to gov't who defines them. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(64-1-18) Author