2024-09-23 01:38:24
This image is unsourced, but seems to rely on the Lozier Institute's work, and anti-abortion think tank, which dramatically conflicts with previous literature on the topic, due to considering "elective and unspecified" as "no reason" In contrast, see: [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(36-4-62) Author
2024-09-23 02:20:21
NNN Just because a figure conflicts with a previous study, does not mean the cited numbers are misinformation. Misinformation means that a post is misleading or false, not that you disagree with the conclusions. If you wish to discuss an issue, do so in the comments instead. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(34-1-13) Author
2024-09-23 11:47:50
To the NNN person— The note highlights two things: 1) Source is a biased source with a significant political agenda 2) Their numbers do not agree with other sources on the same matter. These together do mean they could be misleading, more informs people to be cautious. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-11) Author
2024-09-24 08:43:55
Although the information can be found on website which are anti abortion [Link] , the chart comes from the Guttmacher Institute, who's goal is to expand reproduction rights [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-1) Author