2024-10-04 20:39:53
Virtually all scholars accept that Jesus existed as a historical figure and that there is physical evidence to support this. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(14-1-9) Author
2024-10-04 21:01:23
NNN the linked wikipedia article is a bit funny: it asserts how the historicity of jesus is consensus among reputable experts, but when it comes to archaeological evidence, there really is none mentioned. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-4-8) Author
2024-10-06 13:13:40
Note needed: there are several sources, non-Christian and Christian, that corroborate the existence of Jesus of Nazareth. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(9-1-2) Author
2024-10-06 13:51:47
While no physical artifacts linked to Jesus are known, most historians accept that a person by that name did exist based on contemporary written documents that mention him. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-1-4) Author
2024-10-06 18:40:31
Most historical scholars agree that Jesus existed. The claim that Jesus never existed is regarded as a fringe theory. [Link][Link][Link][Link][Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(29-0-4) Author
2024-10-07 02:19:53
Archeological evidence isn’t the only type of relevant evidence relevant for a figure from 2000 years ago. Very few historians doubt the existence of Jesus because of written evidence. Josephus wrote about Jesus as well as others who were not Christians. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(24-0-9) Author
2024-12-29 02:50:12
Archeological evidence for Jesus having existed. The Megiddo Mosaic from around 230 AD declares the phrase "Jesus is God". [Link] The silver amulet from around 230-270 AD declares the phrase "In the name of Jesus Christ, Son of God!". [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0) Author