2024-10-07 12:59:48
NNN "plausible rights to protection from genocide"' means that it's plausible that theres a genocide happening hence the rights to protection... thats also why the court adopted "provisional measures" [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-1) Author
2024-10-07 13:16:06
NNN - The proposed CN confused the ICC with the International Court of Justice. The latter is hearing the case brought by South Africa. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-1) Author
2024-10-07 14:00:59
The International Court of Justice did not say that Israel is 'plausibly committing genocide'. '...the purpose of the ruling was to declare that South Africa had a right to bring its case against Israel and that Palestinians had "plausible rights to protection from genocide"' [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-17) Author
2024-10-07 18:12:12
NNN. "Palestinians have a right to protection from genocide" protection from whom? NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-1) Author
2024-10-08 04:12:38
NNN. Per ICJ, “the facts & circumstances mentioned above are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa […] are plausible. This is the case with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide […].” [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-1) Author