Community Notes Viewer

2024-10-20 00:30:53
Medical experts advise against using “viability” arguments to limit access to medical care. They also note that whether a “baby can survive outside the womb” cannot be determined for certain, and thus it cannot be used to make such “unequivocal” statements. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(16-1-101)
Author

2024-10-20 01:18:01
NNN. Citing medical experts opinions as a source is laughable these days . Have we learned nothing from all the medical experts "studies, research, and opinions " about the covid 19 fiasco!
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(9-3-11)
Author

2024-10-20 01:30:38
NNN. Post clearly expresses the personal opinion of the author. Proposed note’s appeal to authority cites an ACOG opinion on ethical and policy issues—matters outside the organization’s medical competence. It belongs in the replies, not CN.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-0-6)
Author

2024-10-20 01:40:53
The argument of "Well, we don't know FOR CERTAIN if the baby would survive" as an argument in favor of 9TH MONTH ABORTIONS is laughable. And framing it as a "Restriction on medical choice" is disingenuous and dishonest. NNN.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-1-10)
Author

2024-10-20 01:55:23
NNN. By biological definition, life begins at conception and what we can call "personhood" begins at the 14th day. [Link] Termination of any form of life is killing, legal or not. Murder implies unlawfulness, which the OP has strong ethical reasons to believe should be the case.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(14-3-14)
Author

2024-10-20 01:57:40
It is a crime to kill a living baby 'born alive'. [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-5-61)
Author

2024-10-20 03:02:28
NNN. While I personally strongly disagree with OP, this post expresses an opinion and is non-falsifiable
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-0-6)
Author

2024-10-20 05:53:08
This is a personal opinion. It also happens to be fact, but even if it weren't, it does not need a note.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(22-1-10)
Author