2024-11-01 11:41:37
No note needed NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(61-2-210) Author
2024-11-01 11:59:53
NNN Liz Cheney clearly understands her safety is being risked. Trump said what he said. Comments were not taken out of context. If you want to sanewash this comment go to the comments section. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(70-1-268) Author
2024-11-01 12:36:22
NNN. Post is a personal opinion and not misleading. The CN above is biased and argumentative, as it states that Trump's comment is very reasonable. CNs shouldn't be used to express personal opinions, and CNs doing so should be downvoted so that the user can't abuse the system. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(69-2-209) Author
2024-11-01 13:04:02
Donald Trump’s full quote makes it clear that he was saying she would be less of a war hawk if she were the one going to battle. The video was edited in a manner that implies he was saying she should be executed, which he was not. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(379-6-98) Author
2024-11-01 13:21:16
NNN. He said what he said, and her post is a response to how she feels. Nothing is taken out of context. (To those saying NN: You can find a way to explain away literally anything anyone says, but it doesn’t change what they meant when they said it.) NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(63-3-246) Author
2024-11-01 14:40:13
Rupar: To purposely mislead. To intentionally and grossly mischaracterize a statement and/or video. Aaron’s Publisher: That police officer didn’t say anything noteworthy. Aaron: Don’t worry! I can always Rupar it to get some retweets. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(13-0-35) Author
2024-11-01 16:04:12
Video is clipped & lacks full context. President Trump’s remarks argue that war hawks like Liz Cheney can easily support ongoing wars from D.C., but her stance might differ if she were in combat. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(341-6-62) Author
2024-11-01 16:06:38
He was not talking about Cheney “being at war”. He was describing a fantasy of having “nine rifles pointed at her face.” That’s a firing squad. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(35-3-183) Author
2024-11-01 16:16:24
Video was intentionally clipped to remove the context. Full clip with more context here. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(322-7-73) Author
2024-11-01 17:07:57
The reference to "nine barrels shooting at her" is objectively a suggestion of a firing squad, not of being in combat. There is no logic to the assertion that it was a reference to combat, even when more video is included. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(40-3-201) Author
2024-11-01 18:31:10
Cheney points to Trump’s use of “implicature” (implying what is said while not explicitly stating it) as plausible deniability [Link][Link][Link] The full clip’s “context” [Link] is in fact Trump’s “cancellation & suspension implicature” to maintain deniability for glorifying political violence. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(1-1-24) Author
2024-11-01 22:20:47
Debunked false version of events. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(114-6-42) Author
2024-11-01 23:22:15
Trump didn’t say this. This post is opinion taking the quote out of context. He talked about the reality of war & questions if she would still hold her "pro-war" positions if she were in a situation w/ rifles pointed at her. Entire video in context: [Link] More information: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(189-1-35) Author
2024-11-01 23:57:58
Trump on Liz Cheney’s willingness to send troops to war: “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with 9 barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face.” [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(146-3-49) Author