2024-11-03 19:16:56
Zero states base eligibility for life threatening medical care on gender. OP fails to write clearly and one can only presume that OP is making an untrue comment about abortion. Zero states including those with more restrictions deny life saving care. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-23) Author
2024-11-03 20:46:22
NNN. 1) OP is stating an opinion 2) Proposed CN's own source outlines they myriad of ways that some state laws surrounding abortion are causing delays or outright refusals to provide necessary healthcare. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-0-2) Author
2024-11-04 13:11:02
Under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), hospitals in the U.S. are legally required to provide emergency medical care to anyone needing it, regardless of gender, without unnecessary delay. Hospitals can’t postpone treatment to consult a lawyer. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-5) Author
2024-11-04 15:43:43
Women needing emergency abortions in Texas and Idaho are no longer protected by EMTLA. Those states claim their abortion bans supersede federal EMTLA law regarding emergency abortions. The 5th Circuit agreed with the two states and the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-0) Author