2024-11-15 19:43:15
CNBC has not reported anything like this: [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(2-0-63) Author
2024-11-15 20:00:53
Nnn posting a google search with company names is not a way to show it’s false. Totally ridiculous!!! NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(33-1-8) Author
2024-11-15 20:37:45
It's possible that CNBC was not the source, but a negative google search is not strong enough evidence for a community note. Here is one source for the underlying claim that these advertisers have returned to X. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(25-2-6) Author
2024-11-15 20:42:02
AdWeek claims that MediaRadar data has shown what is claimed in the post; that major advertisers have returned to X, even if the source is not CNBC. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(30-1-3) Author
2024-11-15 21:48:13
I just Google myself and nothing came up therefore I must not exist. www.google.com CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(2-2-15) Author
2024-11-16 11:32:56
This post is based on this article from AdWeek, which says the ad spending on X was recorded from January to September of 2024 at a greatly reduced level, not that those companies “will be resuming” (or increasing) advertising on X in the future. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(16-1-35) Author