2024-11-25 11:00:11
All of these verses are posted out of context. Check each verse on [Link] for the correct context of the verses. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(25-0-2) Author
2024-11-25 18:13:30
NNN. The post is factually correct. Arguments about “context” belong in the comments. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-9) Author
2024-11-26 05:35:29
This is misleading. E.g. 62:5 uses an analogy to compare religious scholars that have access to scripture but do not act upon it, to donkeys carrying books. It does not apply to all non Muslims and it is merely an analogy. All the rest are just as misleading. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(13-0-0) Author
2024-11-26 10:30:25
NN. Community notes, by definition, are used to provide context to prevent misrepresentation and correct factual mistakes. Original poster misses the context behind the statements despite being otherwise correct. Context of the quotes can be easily found. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-1-0) Author
2024-11-26 11:00:33
NN. CNs arguing that context is solely for the comments are incorrect. There is a category for "missing important context" where posts may benefit from added context. It's reasonable to have criticism of Islam, just make sure it is founded in truth with proper context. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(3-0-0) Author