Community Notes Viewer

2024-12-12 19:55:08
Proposed CN is wrong FBI had 26 CHSs at Jan 6: 3 were tasked (1 entered Capitol, 2 restricted area) and 23 went on own initiative (3 entered Capitol, 11 restricted area). OIG confirmed no evidence of incitement. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(44-8-47)
Author

2024-12-12 21:32:18
Tweet should specify the difference between FBI agent and confidential human source, which is a term for a paid FBI informants. Furthermore, no CHS were authorized by the FBI to break the law themselves or encourage others to do so and 23 went to Washington on their own accord [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(39-2-210)
Author

2024-12-12 21:55:35
NNN. The critical takeaway is that individuals on the FBI payroll participated in illegal activities. Since the FBI lied about their presence until now, there is insufficient evidence to claim whether or not these individuals also incited the events of J6 pending investigation.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(88-5-29)
Author

2024-12-12 23:44:23
OP is a screenshot of a portion of p5 of the OIG report, with a reasonable synopsis of it. Combined, this reflects a summary/opinion of author with no identified factual error. Those arguing for much more expansive post should write their own in comments, not CN. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(106-3-23)
Author

2024-12-13 04:50:33
The tone of the post implies that this is a surprise. It is not. A CHS was expected to be there. It is their job and the job of FBI to put them where a crime occurs. In this particular case, they were doing their job as was intended, whichthe watchdog report mainly confirms [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-1-87)
Author

2024-12-13 05:59:45
Misleading. Of the 26 informants, only 3 were directed to be there, the other 23 went on their own intiative. 3 tasked: 1 entered Capitol, 2 restricted area 23 others: 3 entered Capitol, 11 restricted area Inspector General confirmed no evidence of incitement. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(48-3-106)
Author