2024-12-14 00:56:58
The "pharma shill" is a logical fallacy. It is variation on the "poisoning the well" fallacy. [Link][Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-1) Author
2024-12-14 20:17:32
NNN. The term is quoting the people being interviewed and is personal opinion. The note gives nothing to refute the views given by the interviewee outside of gaslighting, and is meant to do the exact fallacy that the note claims the post was doing. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0) Author
2024-12-15 18:33:11
NNN. The "shill gambit" is only falacious when conflict of interest has not been demonstrated. Siri's deposition provides ample evidence that Edwards does in fact get paid by pharmaceutical companies. OpenPayments shows this also: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-0) Author