2025-01-01 22:56:03
The explosion was caused by very large fireworks and/or a bomb carried in the bed of the rented Cybertruck and is unrelated to the vehicle itself and not from a fire from the truck. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(36-2-5) Author
2025-01-01 23:13:01
The headline is misleading. It was not a mechanical problem. The explosives contained in the truck were described as fireworks, gas tanks and camping fuel, which authorities believe were connected to a detonation system. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(47-1-3) Author
2025-01-01 23:33:42
NNN - the headline is not misleading and does not suggest a “mechanical problem” as the other commenter states. It is factually accurate to say that the car exploded. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-3-37) Author
2025-01-02 01:44:38
The headline is misleading. It was not a mechanical problem. The explosives contained in the truck were described as fireworks, gas tanks and camping fuel, which authorities believe were connected to a detonation system. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(232-1-6) Author
2025-01-02 01:52:49
Factually incorrect to frame this as the truck "catching fire", and implying it led to an explosion. In fact, an explosion of gasoline and fireworks in the bed of the truck killed only the perpetrator of the failed attack. Look at the aftermath of the truck for yourself: [Link][Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(90-4-3) Author
2025-01-02 02:24:28
The OP from AP needs additional context: AP’s OP is implying that the cyber truck exploded out of malfunction which isn’t the case. The OP from AP is misleading. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(26-2-5) Author
2025-01-02 02:29:43
NNN: The headline is not misleading, and never implied that the Tesla caused the incident. The very first sentence in the article is “Firework mortars and camp fuel canisters were found stuffed into the back of the Tesla Cybertruck” [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-1-16) Author
2025-01-02 02:38:03
The truck was intentionally detonated. [Link][Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(47-1-4) Author
2025-01-02 17:01:25
Publicly available video footage shows that the vehicle exploded before catching fire, not the other way around. Reversing the sequence of events misrepresents the cause of the incident. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(8-1-1) Author
2025-01-02 20:47:34
The post links the death to the cybertruck catching fire when in fact, the driver who died had a gunshot wound to the head, possibly self inflicted. Therefore he died prior to the explosion and not because of the fire or explosion as implied by AP. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(6-1-0) Author
2025-01-02 21:37:03
NNN This was correct when it was posted BEFORE they knew what happened and the article states the new information in the first paragraph. There is no need for a note. Also please stop spamming CNs. We still rate the garbage notes down - all of them - so you are wasting time. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-1-1) Author