2025-01-12 02:21:28
The Publica’s claim is incorrect: The main perpetrator received a sentence of 2 years and 9 months, while others were given juvenile probation sentences of 1-2 years. A woman who verbally attacked the judge online was sentenced to one weekend in custody. [Link][Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(59-6-54) Author
2025-01-12 02:49:54
The woman “was sentenced to a weekend in jail after she insulted one of the rapists via WhatsApp, calling him a "disgraceful rapist pig" and a "disgusting freak." The rapist she insulted received a suspended sentence, meaning he did not serve time in jail. “ [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(43-0-7) Author
2025-01-12 02:59:39
The cited sources don't refute but instead corroborate the post. All the perpetrators BUT ONE received suspended sentences. They effectively don't go to prison. From context, all other perpetrators can be assumed to be "rapist", having conducted or aided in the crime. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(30-2-6) Author
2025-01-12 05:56:41
In Germany, the separation of powers is a foundational principle established in the Basic Law (Grundgesetz), dividing authority among three branches. The politician Scholz has no influence on the decision of a court! [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(40-5-84) Author
2025-01-12 08:31:20
Nnn Can on separation of power not needed. Although formally on paper there is separation of power: - Legislation is drafted by the Federal Government before it is signed into law. - Judges are chosen by government. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(22-1-14) Author
2025-01-12 10:07:09
Die Jugendstrafen von ein bis zwei Jahren für acht Angeklagte setzte die Kammer zur Bewährung (...) aus. & Eine 20-jährige Frau ist (...) verurteilt worden. Sie muss für ein Wochenende in den Jugendarrest" ->It´s factually correct. She goes to prison, they don´t. [Link][Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(34-0-12) Author