2025-01-30 20:19:34
The Senator did not allow Tulsi Gabbard to answer the question. Instead, each time he asked it, when she started to answer he immediately interrupted her not allowing her to speak. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-0-5) Author
2025-01-30 20:59:12
NNN. Gabbard did not refuse a yes or no answer on the basis of the term "traitor" being inappropriate or misapplied. She repeatedly refused to answer the question and was given ample time. She used her time repeating her work history. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-9) Author
2025-01-30 21:03:01
The legal definition of treason is irrelevant on this post and any note relying on it should be ignored. The question was if Snowden was a traitor not if he committed treason. Further, the inability to answer a “yes or no” question with a “yes” or “no” is, in fact, not answering NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-12) Author
2025-01-31 06:30:36
Whether or not Snowden is a traitor is a matter of opinion; Mr Bennet presents it as fact. People in the intelligence apparatus whose wrongdoing Snowden revealed have a vested interest in saying that he is a traitor, and so such opinions such be treated with caution. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(10-1-4) Author