Community Notes Viewer

2025-02-08 21:10:17
The Judge does cite to law and makes factual findings in his order granting the motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO). The court made the specific finding that the Plaintiffs "will face irreparable harm in the absence of injunctive relief." Sources: [Link] [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(30-3-107)
Author

2025-02-08 22:04:02
NNN-The order does not cite or evaluate the law, nor does it express any findings in law. It reiterates the plaintiffs theories and provides a speculation of possible harm. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(41-1-16)
Author

2025-02-08 22:10:58
NNN The judge has no authority what so ever to judicate a hearing against the executive branch without their being anyone present on the defense, let alone no violation of the Constitution has been sited, which is what the law would require to advance such a motion. [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(44-2-16)
Author

2025-02-08 22:13:03
The order would not ban Secretary Bessent (one of the named defendants) from accessing data, but would prohibit him from granting access to Treasury Department data to others. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(40-4-66)
Author

2025-02-08 22:19:08
NNN - The OP is clear that it is his opinion the judge's general citation of "irreparable harm" is not sufficient to constitute an appropriate, specific legal citation to justify the order. As such, this is a debate over judicial opinions, which belongs in responses, not CN.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(53-3-13)
Author