2025-02-14 00:00:34
The contract was first awarded in 2018, during Trump's first term and ended in 2022 [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(28-1-63) Author
2025-02-14 00:19:05
NNN. Does not matter when it started. The op was factually correct in the original statement. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(57-0-19) Author
2025-02-14 00:33:42
The program that Reuters was paid for was designed to defend against large scale social engineering and deception, not encourage it. The program began in 2018 under the Trump administration and ended in 2022. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(70-0-73) Author
2025-02-14 01:04:03
NNN The OP stated a factual claim that Rueters was paid by DOD. It is irrelevant as to when the funding was given. Trump did not authorize the funds, the DOD did. This is why they are slandering DOGE now. Comment section is for opinion. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(59-0-20) Author
2025-02-14 05:48:09
Reuters reports [Link] that the contract [Link] was for "software and information services to U.S. government agencies across successive administrations for decades, to assist in identifying and preventing fraud, supporting public safety, and advancing justice,". NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(10-0-33) Author
2025-02-14 15:27:28
The post is misleading, DARPA has stated they were red force for a cyber security contract hence the name. Reuters has stated the recipient is an independent firm under a shared parent company. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(10-0-27) Author
2025-02-14 15:32:06
NNN - Take comments to the comments section. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-0-5) Author
2025-02-15 00:25:40
NNN - monies were identified and paid as posted by OP. Opinions and justifications can go in comments. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(15-0-4) Author
2025-03-04 01:10:45
To the NNN, both the OP and people who use this as a source are clearly trying to mischaracterise this payment. Context is needed as many will not see this in replies. [Link] None(0-0-0) Author