2025-02-17 19:16:21
Jesus taught that "the mouth speaks what the heart is full of" (Matthew 12:34). Calling someone a "dummy" reflects a lack of charity and respect, which are central to Jesus’ teachings. He might ask the person to reflect on why they felt the need to use such language. [Link] CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL(6-0-115) Author
2025-02-17 19:24:43
NNN save your snarky evangelizing for the comments NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(37-0-15) Author
2025-02-17 19:24:52
NNN- Wtf is the above note talking about? It is completely irrelevant to the post by JD. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(38-2-13) Author
2025-02-18 06:43:02
There is not a single journalist jailed in the EU for expressing dissenting views. [Link] EU consistently ranks better than the US in freedom of speech rankings. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(28-1-80) Author
2025-02-18 06:46:33
Freedom of speech is usually considered to include protection from governmental retaliation for that speech. Targeting specific media outlets for their reporting may be a 1st Amendment violation and therefore a threat to free speech. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(46-0-89) Author
2025-02-18 06:54:05
Note from Dauntless Sea Tinamou is a “straw man argument” where an original (true) argument is changed to a different (false) argument to claim that it is false. Vance said “people” have been jailed, which is true. Proposed note changes it to “journalist” to make it appear false. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(24-1-11) Author
2025-02-18 06:58:54
NNN The CN reduces the scope to journalists while Vance talks about people. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(24-1-10) Author
2025-02-18 07:29:58
The Dauntless Sea Tinamou note is misleading. Many European journalists have been prosecuted or investigated for expressing views contrary to the predominant view supported by governments and mainstream media. E.g. Eric Zemmour in France: [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(28-1-15) Author
2025-02-18 13:27:09
The note by astonishing peppermint crimsonwing equates a single news outlet being removed from the briefing room to them being prevented from saying anything they want. They are free to print whatever they desire, no one from the government is stopping them. There is no 1A issue NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(16-1-16) Author
2025-02-18 17:23:50
Limiting AL'S access is retaliation for the language used in their reporting, and therefore is limiting free speech. [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(31-1-43) Author
2025-02-18 18:10:36
NNN. Stop arguing opinions in CN. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-0-6) Author
2025-02-18 19:24:15
All of the proposed notes belong in the comments section. NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(13-0-9) Author
2025-02-18 22:48:30
Free speech under the 1st Amend protects from “chilling” or actions that MAY impact free speech. WH interest to preferred news outlets in this context does NOT override all reporters’ rights to free speech without chilling effects. Explanation [Link] SCOTUS decision [Link] History [Link] NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(11-1-25) Author