User:01B12FE65C7530C386418F7B486C21F1F7DF00EF6B155755AE5AA7ACD08EAC65
User Enrollment: NonePosted Notes:3
-HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:3
Posted Ratings:0
-HELPFUL:0
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
Posted Notes
2024-05-04 22:52:07
Notwithstanding the numerical inaccuracies of the post, you would expect the "Britain First" team to have a better understanding of English than to use "less votes" instead of 'fewer votes'. Methinks they doth protest too much. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-2)
Related notes[5]
Notwithstanding the numerical inaccuracies of the post, you would expect the "Britain First" team to have a better understanding of English than to use "less votes" instead of 'fewer votes'. Methinks they doth protest too much. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-2)
Related notes[5]
2024-08-27 00:39:57
Although this post is clearly a joke, it might also be helpful to know that no NATO submarines have been struck by Russian weaponry in the history of mankind. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-0)
Related notes[3]
Although this post is clearly a joke, it might also be helpful to know that no NATO submarines have been struck by Russian weaponry in the history of mankind. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-0)
Related notes[3]
Rated Notes
