User:05D729B4A4895E58E1C8DBF83ED968AFA2A3EF463D9E8666B7EB69BB44D233F8
User Enrollment: NonePosted Notes:4
-HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:4
Posted Ratings:161
-HELPFUL:84
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:2
-NOT HELPFUL:75
Posted Notes
2024-07-14 19:38:48
The now-deceased suspect in the shooting in Pennsylvania was a registered Republican and apparent gun rights enthusiast. No one on the far left or the moderate left is responsible for this act of violence, nor have they endorsed it. In fact, they have condemned it. [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-14)
Related notes[2]
The now-deceased suspect in the shooting in Pennsylvania was a registered Republican and apparent gun rights enthusiast. No one on the far left or the moderate left is responsible for this act of violence, nor have they endorsed it. In fact, they have condemned it. [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-14)
Related notes[2]
2024-07-16 18:15:56
While Doug Ford has again reversed his position on developing the Greenbelt (promising to preserve it), he has done this before, only to secretly order that it be opened up to development. It is misleading to suggest that he can be counted on to keep this promise. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-2)
Related notes[3]
While Doug Ford has again reversed his position on developing the Greenbelt (promising to preserve it), he has done this before, only to secretly order that it be opened up to development. It is misleading to suggest that he can be counted on to keep this promise. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(5-0-2)
Related notes[3]
2024-08-15 03:00:50
The author original CN cannot even distinguish between the words reverence and reference. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2)
Related notes[4]
The author original CN cannot even distinguish between the words reverence and reference. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-2)
Related notes[4]
2024-10-02 13:47:53
The Cass Review is not "widely acclaimed". If it was, the author of the original note would have posted more than a link to Wikipedia. In fact, credible critics have found major flaws in the Cass Review's methodology and findings. [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-13)
Related notes[4]
The Cass Review is not "widely acclaimed". If it was, the author of the original note would have posted more than a link to Wikipedia. In fact, credible critics have found major flaws in the Cass Review's methodology and findings. [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(4-0-13)
Related notes[4]
Rated Notes
