Community Note Viewer

User Details

User:55D2932A2F53137120A3AE08DEE3328CB6CC98C7301AA28C7BF5E8D4E249F723

User Enrollment: None
Posted Notes:5
-HELPFUL:1
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:4
Posted Ratings:456
-HELPFUL:368
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:3
-NOT HELPFUL:85

Posted Notes

2025-01-03 21:16:27
There was a change of methodology. Before April 24, 2020, savings accounts were not part of M1. Even though money supply did grow, it did not grow that much. [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(5-0-0)
Related notes[1]
2024-11-05 15:34:10
That is not true. The surge is primarily due to the effects of a definitional change of M1, now including e.g. savings accounts. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(2-0-1)
Related notes[2]
2024-12-06 16:20:49
Wrong. The Federal Reserve Board changed the method M1 is calculated. The amount of USD in circulation did surge, but not by 80%. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(12-1-4)
Related notes[1]
2025-01-09 07:41:09
This is wrong. Money supply did change, but not as much as 80%. The method used to calculate M1 has been changed. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-0-3)
Related notes[1]
2025-01-12 12:12:43
Kontext: Es geht konkret um den Windpark, der in Hessen im Reinhardswald entstehen soll. Umfang 18 Windräder. Die Aussage ist somit aus dem Zusammenhang gerissen. Vollständige Aussage: [Link] [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(10-1-12)
Related notes[5]

Rated Notes