User:5AD9590F67457FE899E612806489A59ADAD3E3BA91837E8425F61C88A9E7D7D7
User Enrollment: NonePosted Notes:3
-HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:1
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:2
Posted Ratings:0
-HELPFUL:0
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
Posted Notes
2023-09-12 07:16:30
Not true. The cost to short sell is primarily the cost to borrow the shares you don’t own. If the stock goes from 100 to 0 and the borrow cost (+ sale fees are) 5, the return for the short seller is 20x. Not 1x.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-1)
Related notes[2]
Not true. The cost to short sell is primarily the cost to borrow the shares you don’t own. If the stock goes from 100 to 0 and the borrow cost (+ sale fees are) 5, the return for the short seller is 20x. Not 1x.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(0-0-1)
Related notes[2]
2024-02-16 01:10:26
An oversimplified comparison which could mislead viewers. Also consider the impact of exchange rates and land, labour, fuel, transport, sales and marketing, regulation, litigation and other related expenses in the USA v. Russia when making such a comparison. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-1-2)
Related notes[5]
An oversimplified comparison which could mislead viewers. Also consider the impact of exchange rates and land, labour, fuel, transport, sales and marketing, regulation, litigation and other related expenses in the USA v. Russia when making such a comparison. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(1-1-2)
Related notes[5]
Rated Notes
