User:A8D3A0E766F2652BD0B0B67FB2E8E129F908343808DCB831E23D25852B369FB5
User Enrollment: NonePosted Notes:3
-HELPFUL:1
-NOT HELPFUL:0
-NEEDS MORE RATINGS:2
Posted Ratings:0
-HELPFUL:0
-SOMEWHAT HELPFUL:0
-NOT HELPFUL:0
Posted Notes
2024-05-04 04:38:08
The United States spent $25.8 billion on Project Apollo between 1960 and 1973, or approximately $257 billion when adjusted for inflation to 2020 dollars. [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(7-0-1)
Related notes[1]
The United States spent $25.8 billion on Project Apollo between 1960 and 1973, or approximately $257 billion when adjusted for inflation to 2020 dollars. [Link]
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL(7-0-1)
Related notes[1]
2024-10-01 06:38:47
NNN. The previous note incorrectly states that Starling did not meet the requirements linked to the 900 million USD funding. According to the rules, SpaceX would have had to meet those requirements by 2025 only. The Bureau didn't *believe that SpaceX would meet the requirements.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-0-0)
Related notes[2]
NNN. The previous note incorrectly states that Starling did not meet the requirements linked to the 900 million USD funding. According to the rules, SpaceX would have had to meet those requirements by 2025 only. The Bureau didn't *believe that SpaceX would meet the requirements.
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(20-0-0)
Related notes[2]
2024-12-06 09:48:55
The amount of dirt to be removed scales with area of the tunnel: ((diameter/2)^2*Pi). To calculate: (6^2*Pi) / (14^2*Pi)=0.183. So the smaller tunnel actually needs 81.7% less dirt to remove. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-1)
Related notes[2]
The amount of dirt to be removed scales with area of the tunnel: ((diameter/2)^2*Pi). To calculate: (6^2*Pi) / (14^2*Pi)=0.183. So the smaller tunnel actually needs 81.7% less dirt to remove. [Link]
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS(7-0-1)
Related notes[2]
Rated Notes
